natureindex.com

Sitemap

Sign up

Nature Index

  • Home
  • News
    • News home
    • Listings
    • News
    • Comment
    • Nature Index 360°
    • Q&A
    • Dataviz
    • News archive
  • Current Index
    • Institution tables
    • Institutions A-Z
    • Research highlights
    • Country/territory tables
    • Articles
    • Collaborations
    • City maps
    • Custom tables
    • Custom graphs
  • Annual tables
    • 2020 tables
    • 2019 tables
    • 2018 tables
    • 2017 tables
    • 2016 tables
  • Supplements
    • Nature Index supplements
    • Nature Index 2021 Asia Pacific
    • Nature Index 2020 Artificial Intelligence
    • Nature Index 2020 Germany
    • Nature Index 2020 Science Cities
    • Nature Index 2020 South Korea
    • Nature Index 2020 Cancer
    • Nature Index 2019 Materials Science
    • Nature Index 2019 Collaboration and Big Science
    • Nature Index 2019 Young Universities
    • Nature Index 2019 Biomedical Sciences
    • Nature Index 2019 Japan
    • Nature Index 2018 China
    • Nature Index 2018 Science Cities
    • Nature Index 2018 Rising Stars
    • Nature Index 2018 Earth and Environmental Sciences
    • Nature Index 2018 Japan
    • Nature Index 2017 Science Inc.
    • Nature Index 2017 United States
    • Nature Index 2017 Science Cities
    • Nature Index 2017 Saudi Arabia
    • Nature Index 2017 Innovation
    • Nature Index 2017 China
    • Nature Index 2017 Japan
    • Nature Index 2016 Collaborations
    • Nature Index 2016 Australia and New Zealand
    • Nature Index 2016 Rising Stars
    • Nature Index 2016 Saudi Arabia
    • Nature Index 2016 Japan
    • Custom reports
  • Client services
    • Client services
    • 2020 Brochure
  • About
    • FAQ
    • Glossary of terms
    • Knowledge base
    • Nature Index journals
    • Journal selection
    • Using the Index
    • Newsletter signup
  1. Home
  2. Supplements
  3. Nature Index 2017 Science Cities
  4. Top 10 collaborations in New York

Top 10 collaborations in New York

The Nature Index 2017 Science Cities tables show each city’s leading institutions for high-quality science, ordered by WFC, Count and CS for 2016. Also shown are WFC from 2012, the change in WFC between 2012 and 2016 and the Count for 2016. Collaboration tables rank the top intra-city institution pairs by their bilateral collaboration score in 2016.

Export CSV
Rank Institution 1 CS1 Institution 2 CS2 Total CS
1 Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM), Cornell University 14.78 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) 33.87 48.65
2 The Rockefeller University 10.21 Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM), Cornell University 9.10 19.31
3 The Rockefeller University 6.64 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) 10.75 17.39
4 Columbia University in the City of New York (CU) 9.07 New York University (NYU) 7.39 16.47
5 Columbia University in the City of New York (CU) 5.44 Weill Cornell Medicine (WCM), Cornell University 4.28 9.72
6 Columbia University in the City of New York (CU) 3.56 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) 5.35 8.91
7 Mount Sinai Health System (MSHS) 3.95 Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) 4.54 8.49
8 New York University (NYU) 4.42 Mount Sinai Health System (MSHS) 3.17 7.59
9 Columbia University in the City of New York (CU) 3.74 Mount Sinai Health System (MSHS) 3.62 7.36
10 Columbia University in the City of New York (CU) 2.22 American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) 4.78 7.00
« Top 10 institutions in New York
  • FAQ
  • Client Services
  • Institution outputs
  • Country outputs
  • News
  • Supplements
  • Privacy policy
  • California Privacy Statement
  • Use of cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do Not Sell My Info
  • Legal notice
  • Terms
  • Nature.com
  • Nature News
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Asia-Pacific

Springer Nature

Except where otherwise noted © 2021 Springer Nature Limited. All Rights Reserved.
partner of AGORA, HINARI, OARE, INASP, ORCID, CrossRef and COUNTER