In Japan, corporates make reluctant partners
The Japanese government wants to lure more industry funding into universities, but companies need to be convinced they’ll get value.
20 December 2017
Japanese brands are recognized globally for their manufacturing and engineering sophistication. The companies that built them, from Toyota to Sony, don’t just drive the national economy, they also boost research and development.
Japanese corporations are a dominant force in the Nature Index. They were the second-largest contributors after the United States to the share of corporate authorship between 2012 and 2016. Their output accounted for 3.34% of Japan’s total index contribution, outweighing the corporate share in the US, South Korea, and China.
Yet despite their strong publication performance, Japanese companies acknowledge that their scientific activities are primarily motivated by the desire to capture emerging markets before their competitors.
Corporations in Japan have also been reluctant to partner with local universities. They are discouraged by the lengthy administrative process involved in finalizing contracts, and what they see as a lax attitude of researchers to commitments and deadlines. But, with the government increasingly recognizing corporations as an important partner for academia, the relationship might soon grow closer. “We hope a series of government-supported initiatives will lure more corporate funding into universities,” says Takashi Uchino, unit chief of the University-Industry Collaboration and Regional R&D Division at the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT).
Japan’s economy took a drastic hit from the 2008 global financial crisis and was further compromised by the 2011 earthquake. Recovery has been slow, and with growing social and welfare expenses, universities have suffered. Government funding for basic university operating budgets has steadily declined to 1,097 billion yen (US$10 billion) in 2016, down 11% from 2004.
By contrast, corporate R&D has recovered from the hit. According to the government think tank National Institute of Science and Technology Policy (NISTEP), corporate expenditure on R&D in Japan was 13.7 trillion yen (US$120 billion) in 2015, almost quadruple the amount spent by universities (3.64 trillion yen) and ten times that spent by public institutions (1.4 trillion yen).
Corporate Japan accounted for 72.3% of the country’s total R&D investment, outdone only by neighbouring South Korea’s 77.5% and China’s 76.8%. When measured as a percentage of GDP, private sector R&D spending reached 2.57% in Japan, second to South Korea, and well above that of China.
The biggest private-sector spenders on science and technology in Japan are companies with capital worth 10 billion yen (US$90 million) or higher. They make up more than 70% of the corporate R&D. The largest contributor in 2017 was Toyota Motor, with plans to spend 1 trillion yen (US$9 billion) by the end of this fiscal year. A quarter of this investment (up from a fifth compared to last year) is earmarked for research into promising technologies, including artificial intelligence (AI), cruise-control technologies and next-generation eco-friendly vehicles.
Toyota Group is the second-largest corporate contributor to the Nature Index in Japan.
The government is increasingly counting on companies to buoy the country’s economy through ‘open innovation’, an expression that refers to the process of generating ideas and technologies through the joint effort of companies, universities and other institutions. To achieve this goal, it is supporting companies in their R&D activities. According to the OECD, while Japan’s direct government funding for corporate R&D accounted for only 0.03% of GDP in 2014, its indirect support through R&D tax incentives was 0.14% of GDP, the seventh largest among 44 countries surveyed.
Uchino at MEXT adds that the government is also prioritising industry–academia collaboration “to generate innovations that have a positive impact on society.” But the relationship so far has been fraught. While ministry data show that the number of such collaborations has increased year-on-year, most projects are small, with an average corporate investment of about 2 million yen (US$18,000). According to the OECD, Japanese businesses contributed an average 2.7% to higher education R&D expenditure over the past decade, much less than 5.1% in the US, 14.4% in Germany and 34.5% in China.
Companies in Japan, says Yoshikazu Yamaguchi, an expert on industry–academic collaborations and innovation policies at Chiba Institute of Technology, have been wary of collaborating with Japanese universities due to the daunting paperwork and failure of researchers to produce the outcomes companies expect.
Instead, companies prefer to spend generously on overseas institutions. “US universities often establish what they can do in, say, two years before signing a contract, and achieve results as stipulated in the contract,” says Yamaguchi. “Many Japanese universities still don’t have this kind of business mindset and can be sloppy in managing contractual obligations, so companies find it difficult to collaborate with them,” he explains.
To bridge the divide, MEXT last year introduced a matching fund for universities that want to form a consortium with companies. So far, it has selected seven university faculties to which it will provide 170 million yen (US$1.5 million) annually for five years, to establish industry–academic collaboration. MEXT hopes for 2.1 billion yen (US$20 million) in the 2018 budget allocation to help selected universities establish a new office and strengthen the management of these collaborations.
The government is also encouraging companies to triple their R&D investment in academia by 2025, paying particular attention to areas such as artificial intelligence, big data, sensors, and optical technologies, which complement the areas where companies are already investing.
In 2016, the government released a guideline for universities on how to establish organization-level collaborations, as opposed to smaller, individual joint research activities.
That same year, Hitachi established laboratories at The University of Tokyo, Kyoto University and Hokkaido University to achieve a super-smart society, the government’s catchphrase for the seamless integration of cyberspace and the real world. Meanwhile, Chugai Pharmaceuticals is betting on top-tier basic research. In 2016,the company signed a contract to pay 1 billion yen (US$9 million), every year, for 10 years, to the Osaka University Immunology Frontier Research Center (IFReC), led by immunologist, Shizuo Akira, who was the world’s most highly cited scientist in 2006 and 2007, according to Thomson Reuters.
“These collaborations can bring merits for both sides,” says Kumiko Miyazaki, whose research at the Tokyo Institute of Technology looks at strategic management of technologies. “Companies can learn from talented young researchers at universities, while universities can expand the scale of their research amid tight budgets from the government.”
TWO SIDES OF A COIN
Increased reliance on corporations, however, will not necessarily translate into high scientific output. “Companies don’t put so much weight on writing papers,” says Miyazaki.
Companies that spend a lot on R&D are not always the ones that publish a lot of papers in the high-quality journals tracked by the index. The telecommunications company Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation Group (NTT), for example, is the largest corporate contributor to index authorship in Japan, but its R&D expenditure is only about a fifth of Toyota’s, at 210 billion yen (US$2 billion) in 2017. According to the public relations office at NTT, the company sees papers published in high-impact journals as “very important as one subjective measure to evaluate our research strength, and a good motivation for authors.”
The optical equipment manufacturer, Hamamatsu Photonics K.K., is also among the 14 Japanese companies ranked in the global top 100 corporations in the Nature Index in 2012–2016, despite an R&D expenditure this year of a mere 12.4 billion yen (US$100 million). The director of Hamamatsu’s central research laboratory, Tsutomu Hara, says papers published in high-impact journals are good for the company’s image, and the company provides a small monetary bonus to researchers who publish papers. However, Hara says, “as a private corporation, we put more focus on filing patents.”
Honda Motor, whose R&D expenditure was 750 billion yen (US$6.6 billion) in 2017 — more than triple the amount spent by NTT Group — did not make the list of top 100 companies in the index in 2012–2016.
“The importance placed on publishing in high-impact journals depends on the company and the sector,” Miyazaki explains. “In the case of component makers, publications contribute to marketing their products to their customers. But, a buyer would not consider publications to be an important criteria in buying a car.”
Yamaguchi at Chiba adds that many Japanese companies still place more importance on submitting papers to Japanese-language journals and technical journals, which are not represented in the index. Corporate culture also matters, he says. “Companies that allow flexibility in research activities seem to appear more in high-impact journals, even though their R&D expenditure is modest.”
This story comes from Nature Index 2017 Science Inc., which investigates the changing role of corporate institutions in the world of science. See more stories here.