A close look at China's rise
Can the country maintain its record of generating high-quality science in the long term?
25 May 2017
As China continues to increase its global share of research papers, it is worth remembering that publication numbers are just one indicator that a country’s science is thriving.
The Nature Index 2017 China supplement, released today, looks beyond China’s impressive performance in key metrics and examines how the country holds up in other measures of a functioning research ecosystem, such as willingness to make data and research open, science communication and sound science policy.
Until 2014, less than a fifth of China’s papers in the Web of Science were co-authored with an international peer. While China still lags behind Germany, the United States and the United Kingdom in that measure, its percentage of international papers increased to 24% in 2016. And in journals included in the Nature Index, international collaborations make up just over 50% of its papers.
Domestic collaboration remains a large contributor to China’s high-quality science, driven mostly by interactions between institutions in megacities like Beijing, Shanghai and Nanjing. Intercity connections showcase the research and collaboration of two smaller cities, whose pockets of high-quality research are at risk as the young and educated relocate to coastal cities for better opportunities. Explore China's inter-city collaborations.
Over the past two decades, China’s scientific community has started to embrace open science, increasing its number of data repositories and open-access journals. But, strong policies and changes to academic culture are needed before science in the country can become fully open and transparent. Cultural change is also needed to boost participation in science communication among Chinese researchers.
The government’s latest major science policy, known as World-Class 2.0, aims to develop, among other things, a group of globally competitive universities and first-class academic disciplines by the end of the decade. While this project aims to improve China’s higher education system and reform some aspects of academic culture, it remains to be seen whether it can address systemic issues in higher education such as an over-emphasis on rankings and publishing papers in high-impact journals.