Rosalind Franklin Institute

United Kingdom (UK)

1 December 2019 - 30 November 2020

Region: Global
Subject/journal group: All

The table to the right includes counts of all research outputs for Rosalind Franklin Institute published between 1 December 2019 - 30 November 2020 which are tracked by the Nature Index.

Hover over the donut graph to view the FC output for each subject. Below, the same research outputs are grouped by subject. Click on the subject to drill-down into a list of articles organized by journal, and then by title.

Note: Articles may be assigned to more than one subject area.

Count Share
13 0.79

Outputs by subject (Share)

Subject Count Share
Chemistry 6 0.38
Life Sciences 6 0.35
Physical Sciences 3 0.16

1 December 2019 - 30 November 2020

International vs. domestic collaboration by Share

  • 81.91% Domestic
  • 18.09% International

Note: Hover over the graph to view the percentage of collaboration.

Top 10 domestic collaborators by Share (17 total)

  • Rosalind Franklin Institute, United Kingdom (UK)
  • Domestic institution
  1. University of Oxford, United Kingdom (UK) (5.61)
    0.64
    4.97
  2. National Physical Laboratory (NPL), United Kingdom (UK) (1.61)
    0.10
    1.52
  3. Diamond Light Source Ltd., United Kingdom (UK) (1.39)
    0.57
    0.82
  4. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), United Kingdom (UK) (1.02)
    0.57
    0.45
  5. King's College London (KCL), United Kingdom (UK) (1)
    0.05
    0.95
  6. Public Health England (PHE), United Kingdom (UK) (0.60)
    0.22
    0.38
  7. University of Sussex, United Kingdom (UK) (0.49)
    0.01
    0.48
  8. Electron Physical Science Imaging Centre (ePSIC), United Kingdom (UK) (0.47)
    0.13
    0.34
  9. Research Complex at Harwell (RCaH), United Kingdom (UK) (0.41)
    0.20
    0.20
  10. Imperial College London (ICL), United Kingdom (UK) (0.34)
    0.11
    0.23

Top 10 international collaborators by Share (20 total)

  • Rosalind Franklin Institute, United Kingdom (UK)
  • Foreign institution
  1. Wuhan University (WHU), China (0.77)
    0.12
    0.65
  2. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CAMS & PUMC), China (0.27)
    0.22
    0.05
  3. Plasmion GmbH, Germany (0.27)
    0.07
    0.20
  4. Nanjing University (NJU), China (0.22)
    0.04
    0.18
  5. University of Florida (UF), United States of America (USA) (0.19)
    0.06
    0.13
  6. Formosa Plastics Group, Taiwan (0.15)
    0.03
    0.13
  7. University of Southern California (USC), United States of America (USA) (0.15)
    0.01
    0.14
  8. The Foundation For Applied Molecular Evolution (FfAME), United States of America (USA) (0.13)
    0.06
    0.06
  9. University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley), United States of America (USA) (0.13)
    0.06
    0.06
  10. California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3), United States of America (USA) (0.13)
    0.06
    0.06

Note: Collaboration is determined by the fractional count (Share), which is listed in parentheses.

Creative Commons License

Numerical information only is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Return to institution outputs

Except where otherwise noted © 2021 Springer Nature Limited. All Rights Reserved.
partner of AGORA, HINARI, OARE, INASP, ORCID, CrossRef and COUNTER