Barts Health NHS Trust

United Kingdom (UK)

1 December 2017 - 30 November 2018

Region: Global
Subject/journal group: All

The table to the right includes counts of all research outputs for Barts Health NHS Trust published between 1 December 2017 - 30 November 2018 which are tracked by the Nature Index.

Hover over the donut graph to view the FC output for each subject. Below, the same research outputs are grouped by subject. Click on the subject to drill-down into a list of articles organized by journal, and then by title.

Note: Articles may be assigned to more than one subject area.

AC FC
9 0.48

Outputs by subject (FC)

Subject AC FC
Life Sciences 9 0.48
Physical Sciences 1 0.11

1 December 2017 - 30 November 2018

International vs. domestic collaboration by FC

  • 34.18% Domestic
  • 65.82% International

Note: Hover over the graph to view the percentage of collaboration.

Top 10 domestic collaborators by FC (73 total)

  • Barts Health NHS Trust, United Kingdom (UK)
  • Domestic institution
  1. Queen Mary University of London (QMUL), United Kingdom (UK) (2.23)
    0.48
    1.75
  2. University College London (UCL), United Kingdom (UK) (0.58)
    0.26
    0.32
  3. University of Glasgow, United Kingdom (UK) (0.33)
    0.03
    0.30
  4. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom (UK) (0.32)
    0.03
    0.29
  5. St Bartholomew’s Hospital, United Kingdom (UK) (0.23)
    0.13
    0.10
  6. NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (NHSGGC), United Kingdom (UK) (0.14)
    0.03
    0.11
  7. The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom (UK) (0.13)
    0.03
    0.10
  8. Addenbrooke's Hospital, United Kingdom (UK) (0.09)
    0.03
    0.06
  9. MRC Institute of Genetics and Molecular Medicine (IGMM), The University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom (UK) (0.09)
    0.03
    0.05
  10. Imperial College London (ICL), United Kingdom (UK) (0.08)
    0.03
    0.05

Top 10 international collaborators by FC (299 total)

  • Barts Health NHS Trust, United Kingdom (UK)
  • Foreign institution
  1. Copenhagen University Hospital (CUH), Denmark (0.56)
    0.11
    0.46
  2. Leipzig University, Germany (0.50)
    0.12
    0.38
  3. Gilead Sciences, Inc., United States of America (USA) (0.45)
    0.09
    0.36
  4. Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore (0.31)
    0.09
    0.22
  5. Duke-National University of Singapore (Duke-NUS), Singapore (0.31)
    0.09
    0.22
  6. National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore (0.26)
    0.10
    0.17
  7. University of Cincinnati (UC), United States of America (USA) (0.22)
    0.03
    0.19
  8. Duke University, United States of America (USA) (0.21)
    0.10
    0.11
  9. The University of British Columbia (UBC), Canada (0.20)
    0.11
    0.09
  10. Vancouver Prostate Centre (VPC), Canada (0.17)
    0.11
    0.06

Note: Collaboration is determined by the fractional count (FC), which is listed in parentheses.

Creative Commons License

Numerical information only is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Return to institution outputs

Except where otherwise noted © 2019 Springer Nature Limited. All Rights Reserved.
partner of AGORA, HINARI, OARE, INASP, ORCID, CrossRef and COUNTER