Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)
한국과학기술원

South Korea

KAIST has connotations of academic excellence, innovation and entrepreneurship, but also the launch of large-scale projects. The university often ranks highly among other universities of a similar age.

KAIST was established in February 1971 as Korea Advanced Institute of Science, with a loan given by United States Agency for International Development. The university aimed not only to educate young researchers in science and engineering, but also to provide a solid basis for the development of future higher education institutions in Korea.

Its structure was created by an international team, which included the American electrical engineer and vice-president of Stanford University Frederick Emmons Terman. Unlike other public institutions in South Korea, KAIST has freedom to decide upon its entry requirements and course structure, which gives the university a special status.

Today, KAIST has a rich academic portfolio in disciplines such as physics, mathematics, engineering, humanities and social sciences, business and management. The courses are delivered by 5 colleges and 6 schools, with over 33 divisions. KAIST's unique institutes include the National NanoFab Center, which conducts research into nano-devices and their potential applications.

KAIST consists of 2 major campuses situated in Daejeon and South Korea's capital Seoul. They offer over 25 dormitories, 4 libraries and a medical centre. To ensure students are actively engaged in the campus cultural events, the university organises traditional opera and jazz recitals.

KAIST retains sole responsibility for content © 2017 KAIST.

1 June 2017 - 31 May 2018

Region: Global
Subject/journal group: All

The table to the right includes counts of all research outputs for Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) published between 1 June 2017 - 31 May 2018 which are tracked by the Nature Index.

Hover over the donut graph to view the FC output for each subject. Below, the same research outputs are grouped by subject. Click on the subject to drill-down into a list of articles organized by journal, and then by title.

Note: Articles may be assigned to more than one subject area.

AC FC
302 149.09

Outputs by subject (FC)

Subject AC FC
Chemistry 129 68.80
Physical Sciences 172 80.17
Life Sciences 52 21.37
Earth & Environmental Sciences 3 2.50

Highlight of the month

When competition turns into conflict

© Tom Merton/Caiaimage/Getty

© Tom Merton/Caiaimage/Getty

Competition is more likely to escalate into conflict between two people of similar status, an international research team finds.

Wonjae Lee of the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, and colleagues, gathered data on Formula One races between 1970 and 2014 to construct a social network graph formed of nodes representing individual drivers, and connecting lines that represent joint competition in at least one race. A statistical approach was applied to predict the probability of a collision happening between two drivers based on age, points scored, the stability of starting positions over the course of a season, and weather conditions. They found that, providing weather conditions were safe, drivers who were ‘status-similar’ — in terms of age and performance — were more prone to collide.

The study provides a measurable approach for studying the conditions that make conflict escalation more likely, and could inform efforts to ease conflict.


Supported content

  1. PNAS 115, E3361–E3367 (2018). doi: 10.1073/pnas.1717303115

View the article on the Nature Index

See more research highlights from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)

More research highlights from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)

Top articles by Altmetric score in current window

Laboratory layered latte

Nature Communications

2017-12-12

Escalation of competition into conflict in competitive networks of Formula One drivers

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

2018-03-26

1 June 2017 - 31 May 2018

International vs. domestic collaboration by FC

  • 46.08% Domestic
  • 53.92% International

Note: Hover over the graph to view the percentage of collaboration.

Note: Collaboration is determined by the fractional count (FC), which is listed in parentheses.

Affiliated joint institutions and consortia

Return to institution outputs