Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CDUTCM)
成都中医药大学

China

1 December 2019 - 30 November 2020

Region: Global
Subject/journal group: All

The table to the right includes counts of all research outputs for Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CDUTCM) published between 1 December 2019 - 30 November 2020 which are tracked by the Nature Index.

Hover over the donut graph to view the FC output for each subject. Below, the same research outputs are grouped by subject. Click on the subject to drill-down into a list of articles organized by journal, and then by title.

Note: Articles may be assigned to more than one subject area.

Count Share
13 2.19

Outputs by subject (Share)

Subject Count Share
Life Sciences 3 0.09
Chemistry 8 1.82
Physical Sciences 2 0.28

1 December 2019 - 30 November 2020

International vs. domestic collaboration by Share

  • 87.84% Domestic
  • 12.16% International

Note: Hover over the graph to view the percentage of collaboration.

Top 10 domestic collaborators by Share (26 total)

  • Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CDUTCM), China
  • Domestic institution
  1. Sichuan University (SCU), China (4.54)
    1.63
    2.90
  2. Wuhan University (WHU), China (1.44)
    0.14
    1.30
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China (1.35)
    0.52
    0.83
  4. Henan Normal University, China (1)
    0.25
    0.75
  5. Chengdu University (CDU), China (0.76)
    0.28
    0.48
  6. Central China Normal University (CCNU), China (0.61)
    0.22
    0.39
  7. State Key Laboratory of Virology (SKLV), China (0.55)
    0.14
    0.41
  8. Tsinghua University, China (0.49)
    0.07
    0.43
  9. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (UCAS), China (0.48)
    0.10
    0.38
  10. Tibet University, China (0.44)
    0.14
    0.30

Top 10 international collaborators by Share (21 total)

  • Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CDUTCM), China
  • Foreign institution
  1. University of California, Berkeley (UC Berkeley), United States of America (USA) (0.30)
    0.20
    0.10
  2. Ulm University, Germany (0.20)
    0.10
    0.10
  3. New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT), United States of America (USA) (0.17)
    0.04
    0.13
  4. University of California, San Diego (UC San Diego), United States of America (USA) (0.13)
    0.04
    0.09
  5. University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom (UK) (0.11)
    0.06
    0.06
  6. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States of America (USA) (0.10)
    0.02
    0.07
  7. University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), United States of America (USA) (0.10)
    0.02
    0.07
  8. The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (UT Health San Antonio), United States of America (USA) (0.10)
    0.02
    0.07
  9. Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore (0.10)
    0.02
    0.07
  10. Duke University, United States of America (USA) (0.09)
    0.04
    0.04

Note: Collaboration is determined by the fractional count (Share), which is listed in parentheses.

Creative Commons License

Numerical information only is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Return to institution outputs

Except where otherwise noted © 2021 Springer Nature Limited. All Rights Reserved.
partner of AGORA, HINARI, OARE, INASP, ORCID, CrossRef and COUNTER