The University of Queensland (UQ)


For more than a century, The University of Queensland (UQ)’s exceptional study experiences, research excellence and collaborative partnerships have delivered knowledge leadership for a better world.

Across UQ’s three campuses, our 7,200 staff and 54,925 students – including almost 20,000 postgraduates and approximately 20,000 international students from 142 countries – teach, research and study.

With a strong focus on teaching excellence, UQ is Australia’s most awarded university for teaching* and attracts the majority of Queensland’s high achievers, as well as top interstate and overseas students.

UQ’s 280,000 graduates are an engaged network of global alumni who span more than 170 countries and include more than 15,400 PhDs.

UQ consistently ranks among the world’s top universities as measured by several key independent rankings, including the CWTS Leiden Ranking (31)**, Performance Ranking of Scientific Papers for World Universities (39), U.S. News Best Global Universities Rankings (42), QS World University Rankings (46), Academic Ranking of World Universities (54), and Times Higher Education World University Rankings (62).

With a 2019 operating revenue of AU$2.19 billion, including more than $452 million in research investment, UQ’s six faculties and eight globally recognised research institutes cover a remarkable breadth of teaching and research.

In recognition of our research quality, UQ was acknowledged in the 2018 Excellence in Research for Australia initiative for above-world-standard research in 93 specialised fields – more than any other Australian university.

Through UniQuest, UQ’s technology transfer and commercialisation company, UQ is also Australia’s leading university for commercialisation revenue, number of active startup companies and value of equity held in startup companies formed from university intellectual property. 

UQ is one of only three Australian members of the global Universitas 21, and one of only three Australian charter members of the prestigious edX consortium: the world’s leading not-for-profit consortium of massive open online courses (MOOCs).

* UQ has won more national teaching awards than any other Australian university.
** This ranking is measured by the Impact indicator P, P (top 10 per cent), and PP (top 10 per cent) with fractional counting.

UQ retains sole responsibility for content © 2020 The University of Queensland (UQ).

1 November 2019 - 31 October 2020

Region: Global
Subject/journal group: All

The table to the right includes counts of all research outputs for The University of Queensland (UQ) published between 1 November 2019 - 31 October 2020 which are tracked by the Nature Index.

Hover over the donut graph to view the FC output for each subject. Below, the same research outputs are grouped by subject. Click on the subject to drill-down into a list of articles organized by journal, and then by title.

Note: Articles may be assigned to more than one subject area.

Count Share
518 160.88

Outputs by subject (Share)

Subject Count Share
Life Sciences 286 68.23
3 0.11
1 0.01
5 1.49
1 0.01
5 1.97
2 0.72
2 0.53
1 0.08
2 0.06
9 4.40
5 3.60
5 0.35
3 0.23
8 3.75
15 2.24
Somatostatin neurons in the central amygdala mediate anxiety by disinhibition of the central sublenticular extended amygdala
Brain aging in major depressive disorder: results from the ENIGMA major depressive disorder working group
Conditional GWAS analysis to identify disorder-specific SNPs for psychiatric disorders
Familial co-aggregation of schizophrenia and eating disorders in Sweden and Denmark
Association of polygenic score for major depression with response to lithium in patients with bipolar disorder
Genome-wide gene-environment analyses of major depressive disorder and reported lifetime traumatic experiences in UK Biobank
Epigenome-wide meta-analysis of blood DNA methylation and its association with subcortical volumes: findings from the ENIGMA Epigenetics Working Group
A major role for common genetic variation in anxiety disorders
Depression and anxiety in relation to cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies
Bipolar multiplex families have an increased burden of common risk variants for psychiatric disorders
Genome-wide association study of panic disorder reveals genetic overlap with neuroticism and depression
Transcriptomic networks implicate neuronal energetic abnormalities in three mouse models harboring autism and schizophrenia-associated mutations
Developmental vitamin D and autism spectrum disorders: findings from the Stockholm Youth Cohort
An integrative analysis of non-coding regulatory DNA variations associated with autism spectrum disorder
Differential activity of transcribed enhancers in the prefrontal cortex of 537 cases with schizophrenia and controls
19 1.88
3 1.16
1 0.01
76 17.60
9 1.18
4 0.50
6 0.24
4 0.90
1 0.05
5 0.49
6 1.99
7 1.76
18 5.44
14 4.44
11 1.51
13 3.47
3 0.37
2 0.09
8 2.93
9 2.66
Chemistry 113 34.95
Physical Sciences 78 28.16
Earth & Environmental Sciences 107 43.72

Highlight of the month

Ecological compensation policies fail to balance losses

© LeoFFreitas/Getty

© LeoFFreitas/Getty

Protecting or restoring degraded ecosystems is not enough to offset the biodiversity losses associated with industrial development.

Ecological compensation policies are used around the world in an effort to achieve no net loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services, by balancing the destruction resulting from development with the improvement or protection of other areas.

However a modelling study led by researchers from the University of Queensland in Australia found that not one of 18 ecological compensation policies, which were based on existing policies used around the world, met the goal of no net loss of biodiversity, carbon storage and sediment retention.

The success of these policies was limited by the amount of land available for improvement or protection, and the differences in the types of ecosystem losses caused by development and the gains achieved on the land set aside to compensate.

Supported content

  1. Nature Communications 11, 2072 (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15861-1

View the article on the Nature Index

See more research highlights from The University of Queensland (UQ)

More research highlights from The University of Queensland (UQ)

1 November 2019 - 31 October 2020

International vs. domestic collaboration by Share

  • 33.52% Domestic
  • 66.48% International

Note: Hover over the graph to view the percentage of collaboration.

Note: Collaboration is determined by the fractional count (Share), which is listed in parentheses.

Affiliated joint institutions and consortia

Return to institution outputs