Austin Health

Australia

1 October 2017 - 30 September 2018

Region: Global
Subject/journal group: All

The table to the right includes counts of all research outputs for Austin Health published between 1 October 2017 - 30 September 2018 which are tracked by the Nature Index.

Hover over the donut graph to view the FC output for each subject. Below, the same research outputs are grouped by subject. Click on the subject to drill-down into a list of articles organized by journal, and then by title.

Note: Articles may be assigned to more than one subject area.

AC FC
12 0.49

Outputs by subject (FC)

Subject AC FC
Physical Sciences 1 0.10
Life Sciences 11 0.39

1 October 2017 - 30 September 2018

International vs. domestic collaboration by FC

  • 63.17% Domestic
  • 36.83% International

Note: Hover over the graph to view the percentage of collaboration.

Top 10 domestic collaborators by FC (55 total)

  • Austin Health, Australia
  • Domestic institution
  1. The University of Melbourne (UniMelb), Australia (2.77)
    0.41
    2.36
  2. Melbourne Health, Australia (0.98)
    0.28
    0.71
  3. The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity (Doherty Institute), Australia (0.76)
    0.14
    0.62
  4. Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Australia (0.72)
    0.17
    0.56
  5. The University of Adelaide (Adelaide Uni), Australia (0.57)
    0.02
    0.55
  6. Monash University, Australia (0.55)
    0.27
    0.28
  7. The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne (RCH), Australia (0.44)
    0.14
    0.29
  8. Florey Department of Neuroscience and Mental Health, UniMelb, Australia (0.44)
    0.05
    0.39
  9. QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Australia (0.39)
    0
    0.39
  10. Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (RMIT University), Australia (0.33)
    0.02
    0.31

Top 10 international collaborators by FC (402 total)

  • Austin Health, Australia
  • Foreign institution
  1. Harvard University, United States of America (USA) (0.51)
    0.05
    0.46
  2. Columbia University in the City of New York (CU), United States of America (USA) (0.50)
    0.03
    0.48
  3. National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology (NCGG), Japan (0.33)
    0.08
    0.25
  4. Max Planck Society, Germany (0.31)
    0.02
    0.29
  5. University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), United States of America (USA) (0.26)
    0.07
    0.19
  6. Shimadzu Corporation, Japan (0.23)
    0.08
    0.15
  7. University of Montpellier, France (0.20)
    0.04
    0.16
  8. Eijkman Institute for Molecular Biology, Indonesia (0.18)
    0
    0.18
  9. National Institute for Health and Medical Research (INSERM), France (0.17)
    0.06
    0.11
  10. Kyoto University, Japan (0.13)
    0.08
    0.05

Note: Collaboration is determined by the fractional count (FC), which is listed in parentheses.

Creative Commons License

Numerical information only is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Return to institution outputs

Except where otherwise noted © 2019 Springer Nature Limited. All Rights Reserved.
partner of AGORA, HINARI, OARE, INASP, ORCID, CrossRef and COUNTER