ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH)

Australia

1 December 2018 - 30 November 2019

Region: Global
Subject/journal group: All

The table to the right includes counts of all research outputs for ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH) published between 1 December 2018 - 30 November 2019 which are tracked by the Nature Index.

Hover over the donut graph to view the FC output for each subject. Below, the same research outputs are grouped by subject. Click on the subject to drill-down into a list of articles organized by journal, and then by title.

Research collaboration: ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH) is a research collaboration whose article contributions are accrued to its participating partner institutions.

Note: Articles may be assigned to more than one subject area.

Count Share
1 0.04

Outputs by subject (Share)

Subject Count Share
Life Sciences 1 0.04

Top articles by Altmetric score in current window

1 December 2018 - 30 November 2019

International vs. domestic collaboration by Share

  • 59.19% Domestic
  • 40.81% International

Note: Hover over the graph to view the percentage of collaboration.

Top 10 domestic collaborators by Share (4 total)

  • ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH), Australia
  • Domestic institution
  1. non-affiliated author contributions, Australia (0.43)
    0.04
    0.39
  2. Griffith University, Australia (0.25)
    0.04
    0.21
  3. The University of Sydney (USYD), Australia (0.05)
    0.04
    0.02
  4. University of the Sunshine Coast (USC), Australia (0.05)
    0.04
    0.02

Top 10 international collaborators by Share (9 total)

  • ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage (CABAH), Australia
  • Foreign institution
  1. non-affiliated author contributions, Austria (0.07)
    0.04
    0.04
  2. Beijing Novogene Bioinformation Technology Co., Ltd., China (0.07)
    0.04
    0.04
  3. Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Denmark (0.07)
    0.04
    0.04
  4. The University of Auckland, New Zealand (0.07)
    0.04
    0.04
  5. University of Antwerp (UA), Belgium (0.05)
    0.04
    0.02
  6. Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB), Switzerland (0.05)
    0.04
    0.02
  7. University of Lausanne (UNIL), Switzerland (0.05)
    0.04
    0.02
  8. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom (UK) (0.05)
    0.04
    0.01
  9. Wellcome Sanger Institute, United Kingdom (UK) (0.05)
    0.04
    0.01

Note: Collaboration is determined by the fractional count (Share), which is listed in parentheses.

Return to institution outputs